« You're Living in F*ck City! | Main | They're Called "Talkies" For A Reason »

January 18, 2008

Hot or Not -- Presidential Candidate Spouse Edition

TODAY'S STRIP

Thanks to Scott Stantis and his juvenile fascination with Fred Thompson's wife, we can engage in a bit of juvenilia ourselves...

Introducing: Hot or Not -- Presidential Candidate Spouse Edition

Ranked. In order.

14. Whitney Gravel

Rating: ?
Comment: Does Not Compute

13. Carol Paul

Rating: Not
Comment: Not hot, nor should we expect or even want her to be.

12. Lynne Hunter

Rating: Not
Comment: I'm sure she's a great gal, but I just can't get excited about a GOP spouse named Lynne.

11. Janet Huckabee

Rating: Not
Comment: Not even if one were to go back in time to 1974.

10. Jocelyn Keyes

Rating: Not
Comment: May God bless this poor woman. Well, of course, God has already blessed this woman otherwise she would not be worthy of Ambassador Keyes. But still.

9. Alfonso Winston

Rating: Not
Comment: Foot waxing skills or no: no thanks. He's all for you, Winslow!

8. Judith Giuliani

Rating: Not Really
Comment: "Shag Fund" is two letters removed from Hag Fun.

7. Jeri Thompson

Rating: Not All That
Comment: Sorry, Scott (and others): I don't see it.

6. Cindy McCain

Rating: Slightly Hot
Comment: Not my personal cup of tea, but I could see some merits. If I squinted. Or winced.

5. Ann Romney

Scale: Mostly Hot
Comment: After 38 years of Mormon Marital Relations with Monogamous Mitt, she's undoubtedly looking for a little, um, variety. Could be fun.

4. Bill Clinton

Rating: Of course
Comment: Fellatio without all that messy ejaculation? That's gotta be a plus.

3. Elizabeth Kucinich

Rating: And How
Comment: It's become a cliche to ooh and ahh over Mrs. K, but the bottom line is that she's a very attractive woman.

2. Elizabeth Edwards

Rating: Very
Comment: What she may (or may not) lack in visceral, physical hotness, she more than makes up for in being awesome.

1. Michelle Obama

Rating: Smokin'
Comment: Wowee Zowee.

Posted by CJo on January 18, 2008 11:00 AM

Comments

No, No, No, No, No, Dude, No, No, No, No, Dude, Yes, No, No.

Posted by: Sacki at January 18, 2008 12:58 PM

Anybody would be considered attractive next to that last drawing of Carmen. Did Stantis break his hand while drawing her?

Posted by: The Furnace at January 18, 2008 02:06 PM

While I was disturbed by the way that Carmen has no part in the third panel and a massive part in the fourth panel, I think the real atrocity art-wise today is the second panel. Look at Winslow's mouth. Is that supposed to be a probiscis or something?

Posted by: Chris at January 18, 2008 05:05 PM