« | Main | Dangerous Minds »
April 28, 2006
Maddening Liberals
Hammer _____ up your _____.
I've been trying to fill in the blanks for over 30 minutes. I'm pretty sure about the second blank. "Ass." "Up your ass." That's got to be it. But the first blank has me stumped.
Hammer "it" up your ass?
Hammer "the hammer" up your ass?
Hammer "time" up your ass?
Hammer "fucker" up your ass?
Hammer "spoonful of ejaculate" up your ass?
Hammer "rotten crotch" up your ass?
I'm so confused!
Toby, if you're reading, which apparently you are (!!!!! Hey, Toby! 'Sup?!) [see comment from Charles below], could you drop us a line in the comments -- anonymously, if you must -- what on earth that first blank is? Or announce it on the podcast. Speaking of the podcast: Toby, if you truly are reading this website, please tug on your ear during the podcast as a secret signal. Wait wait. That won't work. How about you say the word "tug" at any point and in any context during the podcast. Then we'll know for sure.
In the meantime, please tell Scott to hammer ____ up his ____.
Comments
Are those supposed to be tattoos on that guy's arms? He should hammer that tattoo artist somewhere with something.
Posted by: The Furnace at April 28, 2006 08:48 AM
Might be tattoos or an unraveling sweater. I suspect Scotty was either hitting the gin and tonics or huffing Sharpies and started doodling in his stupor.
Posted by: Anonymous at April 28, 2006 07:47 PM
You know, this reminds me of "The Buckets".
In case I have to remind you, "The Buckets" was Scott Stantis' OTHER comic-strip that be started 10 years before "Prickly City". He quit working on it and passed it to his assistant Greg Cravens. (his name still appears in the byline, though)
Anyway, I have one of the "Buckets" book collection titled "Car Trips and Other Living HELLS". In this case, Hell is referring to a place, but some people may think Scooter was being hypocritical about this week's storyline.
And since I'm talking about this book, I guess I might as well say Stantis was kind enough to autograph it for me (True!)
Posted by: Charles Brubaker at April 29, 2006 04:54 AM
technically, would #5 be a santorum, or is that only on the way out?
Posted by: speedyhed at April 29, 2006 11:44 PM
